REVIEWS

Home News About Us Products Prices Warranty Awards Reviews Interviews Presentations
Shows Dealers FAQ Feedback Contact Us Links PayPal Sign guestbook
  View guestbook
OWNER'S PAGE

 

Products

Power amplifiers
       M1.2 Reference
     
description  specs
       M2.2
    
description  specs
       ML1.1
    
description  specs
      ML2.1
    
description  specs
ML3 Signature
    
description  specs
Preamplifiers
LL2.1(regular/deluxe)
     description  specs
LL1 Signature
    
description  specs
     L2 Reference
    
description  specs
     LP2 (regular/deluxe)
                phono preamp
     description  specs

Prices


AUDIO, May'1998
Bascom King

Vladimir Shushurin, president and chief designer of Lamm Audio Laboratory, says that the M2.1 hybrid mono amplifier is one of his best creations.  It’s a Class-A/AB design rated at 200 watts in Class AB into an 8- or 4-ohm load, and it is said to handle impedances as low as 1 ohm.

Lamm also makes the Model M1.1, which is the same size as the M2.1 but is $400 more expensive.  Although the M1.1 delivers only 100 watts into an 8- or 4-ohm load, it does so in pure Class A.  (And, like the M2.1, it can drive loads down to 1 ohm.)  The DM1, a dual-mono version of the M2.1 rated at 125 watts/channel into 8 ohms, will soon be available for about $8,700.  Another Lamm Audio Laboratory component is the L1 line preamp ($6,990).  Under the Lamm Industries banner are two mono tube amps, the push-pull ML1 ($9,990 each) and the single-ended ML2 ($14,645 each). 

M2.1 switches to Class AB at a relatively high power level.  This ensures that it will be in Class A during most of your music listening, even if you use low-impedance speakers. But it also gives the amp very high power dissipation – more than 200 watts – at idle.  The resulting heat is handled by six large, finned sinks, three on each side.

The M2.1 is big and beautiful, with nothing on its front panel except lettering for the company name and model number, a red power-on LED, and a pair of rack handles.  The on/off switch is on the rear (presumably, Shushurin wants you to leave the amp warmed up, despite its heat dissipation).  Another rear-panel switch sets the M2.1 for a high-impedance load (8 to 16 ohms) or a low-impedance load (1 to 6 ohms).  Also on the rear panel are a balanced input, accessible via a Neutrik XLR connector or a pair of Esoteric Audio phono jacks (also usable for inverting or noninverting input from an unbalanced source); two pairs of Esoteric Audio five-way binding posts for speaker connections; two remote-control jacks, which enable daisy-chaining two or more units together for common control; an IEC AC cord connector; an AC line fuse; and a binding post for ground connection.  A pair of handles on rear panel, a nice touch, greatly assists you in handling and moving the amplifier.

Most of the circuitry, including the tube (a 6922 dual triode) that marks this amp as a hybrid, is on a large board attached to a horizontal sub-chassis.  I noted many high-quality parts, including Dale metal-film and PRC wire-wound resistors, Electrocube and Roederstein film capacitors, and Cornell Dubilier switching-grade electrolytic capacitors. On the underside of the sub-chassis are a pair of 39,000-microfarad/75-volt main filter capacitors, a power-supply and system-control board, and the power transformer.  That transformer, a 1,700-volt/ampere toroidal unit made by Plitron, is isolated in a metal sub-enclosure that measures 3 ¾ x 7 x 7 inches.  Construction and wiring quality is first-rate.  An especially elegant touch is the use of Lemo CAMAC connectors for the cables that connect the input jacks to the main circuit board.


Measurements

Lamm Audio Laboratory sent me two M2.1s, which I’ll refer to as amps A and B.  Because their performance was very similar in most tests, reported results are mostly for amp A. Unless stated otherwise, the loading switch on the rear panel was set for high impedance (8 to 16 ohms) with an 8-ohm load and for low impedance (1 to 6 ohms) with loads of 4 ohms and less.  Frequency response is plotted in Fig. 1.  The effect of changing load is minimal and is uniform over the entire spectrum.  Response with an NHT dummy load (not shown) fell between the open-circuit and 4-ohm curves, which means that the frequency response deviation caused by a typical speaker load would be essentially inconsequential.




Rise and fall times at an output level of + 5 volts into 8 ohms were w microseconds. Notable in the square-wave response (Fig. 2) is the way the Lamm amp handles an additional 2-microfarad capacitance (middle trace); there’s very little ringing here. The slight tilt in the 40-Hz (bottom) trace is caused by the time constant of the coupling capacitor between the driver and output stages.

 

 

Distortion was essentially the same for the M2.1’s balanced and unbalanced inputs, which is excellent.  I used unbalanced signals via the noninverting input for Figs. 3 through 6.

 

 

Total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD + N) as a function of power into 8-, 4-, and 2-ohm loads is plotted in Fig. 3.  Figure 4 shows SMPTE IM distortion for the same load conditions and for a 4-ohm load with the amp’s rear-panel loading switch set for high impedance, instead of the recommended setting. 

 

 

 

In Fig. 5, THD + N is plotted versus frequency for different power levels; note how little it rises at high frequencies, a desirable but very rare characteristic. A spectrum analysis of the harmonic distortion residue of a 1-kHz signal, at a power level of 10 watts into 8 ohms, is presented in Fig. 6. 

 

 

 

Commendable is the absence of any higher harmonics above the third.  All in all, the M2.1’s distortion performance is very good, especially in view of the low amount of feedback employed.

 

 

 

Common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) for balanced input is shown in Fig. 7 for both of the amps I tested.  The curve shapes may differ, but each amplifier did well on this test.  That’s particularly true at high frequencies, where many amplifiers’ CMRRs decrease.

 

 

The M2.1’s damping factor is reasonably constant with frequency.  You can see this clearly in Fig. 8, but it can also be inferred from Fig. 1, which demonstrates that output level at all frequencies drops uniformly as the load impedance decreases.

Dynamic power with an 8-ohm load was 233 watts (corresponding to clipping headroom of 0.66 dB) and did not sag at all during the 10-millisecond test period.  With lower load impedances, there was some sag over the burst interval, however: Output went from 264 to 253 watts into a 4-ohm load, from 484 to 462 watts into a 2-ohm load, and from 800 to 684 watts into a 1-ohm load.  Dynamic headroom at the beginning of the tone-burst test interval was 1.2, 0.83, and 1.2 dB, respectively, for the three loads.  Clipping power at about 1% distortion was 280 watts for an 8-ohm load, 310 watts for a 4-ohm load, and 500 watts for a 2-ohm load, corresponding to clipping headroom of 1.5, 1.9, and 1 dB.

Voltage gain was 31.8 dB, with negligible difference between unbalanced and balanced input.  Input sensitivity for 1 watt into 8 ohms was 72.7 millivolts.  Output noise for unbalanced input was 655.9 microvolts, wideband, and 223.7 microvolts, A-weighted; for balanced input, the results were 655.3 and 253.4 microvolts, respectively. Input impedance was 40 kilohms at 1 kHz.  With the M2.1 warned up enough to stabilize, DC offset at the output was within 10 millivolts of zero.  When it was cold, AC line draw was a little more than 5 amperes and dropped to 4 amperes once the amp stabilized, which is consistent with Lamm’s claimed levels for power output in Class A.

But let’s look at that question another way.  In Class-A operation, every output device in an amplifier is always conducting current, even when there’s no signal – hence the high idling current.  As a signal is applied, current through one output device will rise while current through its push-pull or complementary mate will decrease until the signal reverses polarity.  When the current through either device reaches twice the idling current, natural circuit action reduces the current through its mate to zero, beyond which point the amplifier’s operating mode changes from Class A to Class AB.

In the Lamm M2.1, setting the load switch for high impedance also sets the output stage’s idling current to 1.5 amperes.  (To simplify things, let’s consider the six paralleled MOS-FETs in each half of the output stage as two single devices.)  If you drive one output device to the point where it’s conducing 3 amperes of current and the other device’s current falls to zero, the entire 3 amperes of current will pass through the 8-ohm load.  At that point, peak output voltage reaches 24 volts (3 amperes x 8 ohms).  And 24 volts into 8 ohms equals 36 watts – exactly what Lamm says the M2.1 can deliver in Class A with an 8-ohm load.

Up to this point, the M2.1’s output stage is drawing constant power from the power supply.  Past this point, because the power-supply rail voltages are considerably higher than +24 and –24 volts (+69 and –69 volts, in fact), the mode of operation shifts to Class AB but output power continues to increase up to the point where the output waveform starts to clip.  In my lab, with an 8-ohm load and the Lamm amplifier’s load switch set for high impedance, AC line draw stayed at a steady 4 amperes until output power reached 30 to 40 watts.  At higher output levels, the line draw started to increase, indicating that the amp was no longer operating in class A.  Although I did not repeat this test for 4-, 2-, and 1-ohm loads (or for the low setting of the impedance switch), I am confident the results would bear out Lamm’s claims of Class-A power output of 36, 18, and 9 watts, respectively.


Use and Listening Tests

I’ll cut right to the chase: The Lamm M2.1’s sounded absolutely terrific!  Their ability to resolve sonic detail was amazing.  They provided an excellent sense of air and space and a very specific soundstage – miraculously, without the edginess that too often accompanies such fine resolution.  Their portrayal of dynamic shadings was outstanding.  When things got loud, they got loud naturally and didn’t sound strained.  I found myself wanting to play things louder than I usually do with most other amps.  Bass extension, sense of pace and rhythm, and slam were as good as I’ve heard in my system.  Overall, the M2.1s were among the very best amplifiers I have heard in my listening room.  I believe these sound qualities correlate with the M2.1’s high output-stage idling current, its low order of distortion production, and the way its distortion and damping factor stayed relatively constant with frequency.

The only negatives to the M2.1 are its high power consumption and high cost.  An AC line draw of 8 amperes is definitely not trivial, and $15,000 per pair isn’t cheap!  Ah, but really good things are seldom cheap.  The Lamm amps performed flawlessly in my lab and in my listening room.  If you get the idea that I am enthusiastic about them, you’ve got it right!


Circuits Highlights

Signals flow into the M2.1 throughout high-speed, unity-gain buffers designed for video instead of the usual op-amp input buffers that use feedback to achieve unity gain.  Separate buffers for the input signal’s positive and negative phases provide a high input impedance and a low output impedance to drive the circuity in the input stage proper.  This is differential cascode amplifier, consisting of a pair of P-channel J-FETs whose drain outputs drive the emitters of a pair of PNP transistors.  A multi-transistor current-mirror circuit is used here as a current source for the Lamm amplifier’s J-FET input devices.

Next in the signal chain is the 6922 dual triode.  It serves as a the last voltage amplifier (LVA) stage, which provides the voltage swing for the output stage.  The grid of the first tiode section is driven from one collector output of the cascode input amplifier.  This section’s plate is coupled to the second triode section’s cathode and grid circuit, in an arrangement similar to that called a mu follower.  Even though the output impedance of this stage is fairly low, on the order of several kilohms, Lamm did not deem it low enough to drive the input capacitance of the output stage.  Therefore, the output of the LVA tube stage feeds a drive stage, which consists of an NPN bipolar transistor loaded by an NPN-transistor current source.  Negative feedback (6 to 7 dB of it, according to Lamm) runs from the output of the driver stage to the inverting input of the input differential cascode.  (There is no negative feedback around the output stage or overall feedback around the amplifier.)

The feedback loop is a bit out of the ordinary. The input buffer is coupled to the input differential cascode via four resistors.  Two of the resistors form a voltage divider from the positive-phase buffer into the noninverting input of the differential amplifier.  The other two resistors form a feedback voltage divider.  One of these (which would be grounded in a conventional design) connects the negative-phase buffer to the inverting input and serves as the shunt feedback resistor; the other resistor, for series feedback, connects the input with the output of the NPN driver stage.

M2.1’s output stage comprises six pairs of complementary MOS-FET power transistors.  The input to this stage is capacitor-coupled from the emitter of the driver transistor via separate capacitors to the gate circuits of the N- and P–channel MOS-FETs.  A voltage divider and bias-spreading regulator at this stage’s input keep its quiescent idling current stable and virtually eliminate DC offset in the output signal.  The resistors closest to the MOS-FET gate drive lines in this voltage divider are bootstrapped from the amplifier’s output so that the coupling capacitors will see a high input impedance.  This enabled Lamm to use relatively small, high-quality film capacitors.

A hybrid design like the M2.1, whose solid-state stages are in full operation while its tube stage warms up, needs some way to prevent large output swings during start-up.  In the M2.1, an output speaker relay remains open long enough for the amplifier to reach stability.  This relay also opens if the AC line voltage drops below a set threshold level or if there is excessive DC at the amplifier output.  Furthermore, if the output relay opens for these reasons, the output stage’s idling current is cut back to zero.  In addition, a resistor in series with the power transformer’s primary reduces in-rush current when you power up the M2.1; after a suitable delay, the resistor is bypassed by another relay.

The M2.1’s front end (everything except its output stage) is powered by a regulated supply that delivers +125 volts and –125 volts, via dropping resistors.  This supply also feeds three-terminal regulators to provide +13 volts and –13 volts to power the input buffers.  The output stage’s supply voltages and quiescent idling current depend on the setting of the loading switch on the rear panel.  When this switch is set for low impedance (1 to 6 ohms), the voltages are about +53 volts and –53 volts and idling current is about 2.1 amperes. When it’s set for high impedance (8 to 16 ohms), voltage increases to +69 volts and –69 volts and quiescent idling current drops to 1.5 amperes.

An unusual circuit, between the power cord and the power transformer’s primary, is intended to eliminate small DC components that may arise from waveform asymmetry in the incoming AC.  Eliminating this DC keeps the toroidal power transformer in the middle of its linear magnetic operating region, helping to reduce mechanical hum. This circuit is, effectively, a full-wave rectifier bridge whose two DC outputs are shorted together; it eliminates the DC while AC proceeds to the transformer via two large capacitors that bypass the bridge.